As I was surfing the internet tonight I came across an issue that I had briefly read about earlier in the election system. What I came across was the official website for the “Fair Tax.” If my memory is correct, I recall a president candidate or two running with a major part of their platform being the “Fair Tax” system. According to the site, John Cox, Alan Keyes, Ron Paul and Mike Gravel all supported the Fair Tax. John McCain did not support the Fair Tax. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton did not give and official answer one way or another. The official website can be found here.
Here is my official view of this proposed tax policy.
Under the Fair Tax system, there is no income tax. If you make $10/hour and work 80 hours during your pay period you will get a paycheck for $800, instead of the tax adjusted amount. The government has to get their money from somewhere though, and the Fair Tax system suggests that they should get it from sales taxes. The Fair Tax systems is actually entirely consumption based. Those who like to spend a lot of money will pay the most in taxes. Those who are savers will be rewarded by paying less in taxes. Compared to the current income tax based system, the Fair Tax would be the equivalent of a 23% income tax. Compared to a sales tax, the Fair Tax system would have a 30% sales tax.
Fairtax.org makes some compelling arguments for why a switch to this kind of system would be a good idea. Their main arguments are:
- Enables workers to keep entire paychecks
- Enables retirees to keep entire pensions
- Refunds in advance the tax on purchases of basic necessities
- Allows American products to compete fairly
- Brings transparency and accountability to tax policy
- Ensures Medicare and Social Security funding
- Closes all loopholes and brings fairness to taxation
- Abolishes the IRS
The people in favor of the Fair Tax feel that too much time money and confusion is spent each year attempting to file taxes. With a flat rate sales tax, this would cover all government expenses without all the confusion.
Some critics argue that the Fair Tax system would eliminate the deduction that is taken on interest payments on a home. Fairtax.org argues that since you will have more take home income this would offset the deduction that you would normally take. They also claim that “With the fair tax, mortgage interest rates fall by about 25 percent (about 1.75 points) as bank overhead falls.” Homes also become more affordable since “first-time buyers save for that down payment much faster, as savings are not taxed.”
The Fair Tax system has created what they call a “prebate.” This is essentially a prepayment by the government to offset the estimated amount of taxes that one would pay on essential goods and services. For example, a household with two adults and two children would receive a prebate of $537/month. This is based on the assumption that they will spend $28,000 on essential goods and services. Hawaii and Alaska oddly enough have a different prebate table, which actually result them receiving a greater amount in prebate money.
Some people argue that the prebate is pointless, and food and medicine items should just not be taxed. FairTax.org responds to this by saying, “the wealthy spend much more on unprepared food, clothing, housing, and medical care than do the poor. Exempting these goods, as many state sales taxes do, actually gives the wealthy a disproportionate benefit.” They also feel that “exempting one product or service, but not another, opens the door to the army of lobbyists and special interest groups that plague and distort our taxation system today.”
Although the system was designed to be free of loopholes, there is one that really stands out to me. The Fair Tax only taxes new goods. The theory behind this is that the item was taxed already when it was first purchased and should not be taxed a second time as a used item. Therefore, people who purchase used goods will not have to pay the tax. This could could have a couple of benefits/drawbacks. Poor people are more likely to buy used than the rich, and therefore will be saving 30% automatically on all used goods. At the same token, used goods could be sold at a 30% premium because it is common knowledge that these items aren’t going to be taxed, and therefore the missing tax gets passed on to the business owner in the form of higher profits. Having no tax on used items is something that would make any environmentalist happy. With a automatic 30% markdown on all used items, it would encourage people to buy used rather that new and would help to reduce consumption and encourage reusing old items.
Having no tax on used goods could have a major negative impact on companies though. Imagine a car manufacturer like Ford. Why would someone want to pay a 30% tax on a new $30,000 car ($9000 in taxes added on). The $30,000 car would actually cost $39,000 after taxes. It is a common theory that vehicles lose 20-25% of their value as soon as you drive them off the lot. At 20% we could conservatively say that the $30,000 car would be worth $24,000 not long after it was first purchased. Let’s say that the value drops by 20% by the end of the first year of ownership. Why would someone want to pay a $15,000 premium for a car that is a year newer? Remember that the slightly used car would not be taxed and the new one would. This would not make any sense at all from a consumer’s standpoint. I think that this Fair Tax system would have a very negative impact on big ticket item manufacturers.
I think one major advantage of the Fair Tax system is that it would help to reduce tax evasion and illegal immigrants. People can definitely evade taxes in this system by buying used goods, but there are times when you have to buy new goods. Food, medicine, motor oil and gasoline are some major items that quickly come to mind. The Fair Tax system would increase the amount of money that is put into the tax system by illegal immigrants. The system would also give a large incentive for illegal immigrants to become citizens. The prebate is given out to “all valid Social Security cardholders who are U.S. residents.” Illegal immigrants would not fall into this category and would not qualify for the prebate. They would be forced to either qualify for citizenship, or pay the 30% tax for food without a prebate.
Overall I think that the Fair Tax system has the potential to be an effective system. It has a few issues with it that could use a little more ironing out, but as our current tax system becomes more an more confusing I could see an increasing movement towards this type of system. For those who are interested in reading more about the Fair Tax, there is a book dedicated to the subject written by Neal Boortz and John Linder.
For a link to the official Fair Tax Act of 2007 – HR 25/S 1025 plain English summary, click here.
Personal Finance, Reviews, Savings, Websites
fair tax, flat tax, review, sales tax, taxes
Recent Comments